Providing a substantive criticism on an article “Target Article” by

1. What is the goal of the author? 2. Do you agree or disagree with the author’s argument? Why or why not?

3. Would you add anything to her analysis? First person is fine Is the paper clearly written, well organized and does it offer the reader a logical, easily followed development of ideas? Has the paper been carefully proof-read, corrected and free of mechanical errors (grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc.)? Does the introduction give the reader an idea what to expect by describing the scope, focus and intent of the paper? Does the paper have a succinct conclusion that focuses the reader’s attention on the main ideas?

Is the research base and use of scholarly resources sufficient to support the task undertaken? Is the thesis of the paper clear and developed in sufficient depth that the conclusions drawn seem warranted? In other words, is there a clear, persuasive argument being made that reflects both the complexity of the subject and alternative points of view? Is the documentation appropriate and the style of notes and bibliography correct and complete?

#Providing #substantive #criticism #article #Target #Article

Table of Contents

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

Christian and kingdom ethics

In Part One of Kingdom Ethics, Gushee and Stassen are doing two things at once: they are laying out a way of analyzing ethical theories

Brand creation and management

Brand creation and management Discuss and evaluate the brand’s creation from inception up to its contemporary management. (Include heritage, identity and awareness) Part two: Brand

New questions

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!